BILL ANALYSIS                                                                                                                                                                                                    



                                                             


 ------------------------------------------------------------ 
|SENATE RULES COMMITTEE            |                   SB 558|
|Office of Senate Floor Analyses   |                         |
|1020 N Street, Suite 524          |                         |
|(916) 445-6614         Fax: (916) |                         |
|327-4478                          |                         |
 ------------------------------------------------------------ 
  
                              
                       THIRD READING
                              

Bill No:  SB 558
Author:   Baca (D)
Amended:  5/18/99
Vote:     21

  
  SENATE PUBLIC EMP. & RET. COMMITTEE  :  3-0, 5/10/99
AYES:  Ortiz, Baca, Karnette
NOT VOTING:  Haynes, Lewis
 

 SUBJECT  :    County employee retirement benefits

  SOURCE  :     Los Angeles County Professional Peace Officers  
Association

 
  DIGEST  :    This bill provides that counties operating  
retirement systems under the County Employees Retirement  
Law of 1937 shall grant a service connected disability  
retirement (provided for job-related injuries) when a  
safety member, firefighter, or certain "active law  
enforcement" employees develop cancer, as specified.

  ANALYSIS :    Existing County Employees Retirement Law of  
1937 ('37 Act) provides:

 Existing '37 Act "Service Connected" vs. "Non-Service  
Connected" Disability Benefits Under the '37 Act
  
1.That there is no distinction between safety and  
  non-safety members' benefits when they become disabled  
  (i.e., safety and non-safety disability retirement  
  benefits ARE THE SAME).
                                                 CONTINUED





                                                      SB 558
                                                       Page  
2


2.Different benefits to disabled employees, depending on  
  whether or not the injury is determined to be job-related  
  or "service connected."

3.Service connected disability benefits are 50% of final  
  compensation (regardless of years of service), with 100%  
  of that amount provided to the spousal survivor.

4.Non-service connected disability benefits are up to 1/3  
  of final compensation (based on years of service), with  
  60% of that amount provided to the spousal survivor.

  Existing '37 Act Law Provides that "Heart Trouble" is  
Presumed to be Service Connected for Disability Retirement  
Purposes

  Existing '37 Act law, provides that "?a safety member, a  
firearm member, or a member in active law enforcement who  
has completed five years of service?" who develops heart  
trouble shall receive a service connected disability  
retirement benefit.

Existing '37 Act law does not provide a service connected  
disability benefit to county employees who develop cancer.

This bill provides that, in the 20 counties that operate a  
retirement system under the '37 Act, a safety member, a  
firefighter or a member in active law enforcement with five  
years of service who develops cancer:

1.Shall be granted a service connected disability, if they  
  are exposed to a known carcinogen (as described).

2.That the cancer "presumption" is for determining service  
  connected disability is disputable and may be  
  controverted by certain described evidence.

3.That the cancer "presumption" shall be extended to a  
  member following termination for a period of three months  
  per year of county service (up to a maximum of 60  
  months).

4.That "member in active law enforcement" is described as  







                                                      SB 558
                                                       Page  
3

  "?a member engaged in active law enforcement who is not  
  classified as a safety member."

  Comments

  The Public Employees Retirement Law does not contain either  
a "heart presumption" or a "cancer presumption," but relies  
upon the decision of the Worker's Compensation Appeals  
Board (WCAB) decision as to whether or not an injury is  
job-related.  Based upon the WCAB job-relatedness ruling,  
injured PERS "safety" members are eligible for either an  
"industrial disability" or a "normal disability."  
  
 FISCAL EFFECT  :    Appropriation:  No   Fiscal Com.:  No    
Local:  No


  SUPPORT  :   (Verified  5/17/99)

Los Angeles County Personnel Peace Officers Association  
(source)
Los Angeles County Probation Officers Union
Association for Los Angeles Deputy Sheriffs
Los Angeles Police Protective League
Southern California Alliance of Law Enforcement (SCALE)
Sacramento County Deputy Sheriffs' Association
Long Beach Police Officers Association
California Coalition of Law Enforcement Associations
California Professional Firefighters

  OPPOSITION  :    (Verified  5/17/99)

California State Association of Counties

  ARGUMENTS IN SUPPORT  :    Proponents contend that this bill  
prescribes a similar presumption in the case of the  
development of cancer.  While some might argue that this is  
problematic, there is research that shows that stress to  
the body plus the presence of carcinogens in the work place  
does relate in the development of and can result in various  
cancers.  Proponents believe that public safety officers  
and firefighters are exposed to both factors in their work  
environment.  No one can deny the dangerous exposure to a  
multiplicity of hazardous physical factors is on the job  







                                                      SB 558
                                                       Page  
4

with every peace officer and firefighter.

  ARGUMENTS IN OPPOSITION  :    According to the California  
State Association of Counties, the County Employees  
Retirement Law of 1937 provides that the development of  
heart trouble by specified safety members shall be presumed  
to arise out of and in the course of employment.

CSAC believes that this bill prescribes a similar  
presumption in the case of the development of cancer.  

CSAC states that their experience that a presumption of  
causation creates a burden of proof that is extremely  
difficult to achieve.  It will impose upon employers costs  
for disability retirements, each one of which may cost  
hundreds of thousands of dollars, which are of doubtful job  
causation.  
  

TSM:cm  5/19/99   Senate Floor Analyses 

               SUPPORT/OPPOSITION:  SEE ABOVE

                      ****  END  ****